My Private Area (pt. 2)

For two solid weeks, we heard testimony from prosecution witnesses. The key witnesses for the prosecution were the two victims, the family friend who finally alerted the authorities back in October of 2008, and Seattle police officers.

The witnesses were interesting to say the least. One witness actually pointed directly at me when asked to point to the defendant in the courtroom. Yikes. Anyways, I felt awful for those forced to relive the awfulness of what happened. No details were spared for the most part.

After the police were alerted, a search warrant was issued for the defendant’s apartment. A couple days after the warrant was obtained, the Seattle police had the defendant in custody.

It goes against human nature to not be able to react. Seated right next to the witnesses was possibly more difficult than watching the horrific videos. I wanted badly to comfort those in pain, especially when they had to sit there in tears during a sidebar.

As I said, we got testimony from the two victims, 3-4 family friends, and all the police involved with this search warrant. The cops were there to document the procedures used to handle evidence during the search of the defendant’s apartment.

After a week of testimony, I didn’t think the prosecution had swayed me much. The burden of proof was on the prosecution, but after four days of testimony… it was fairly inconclusive in my mind. There were some graphic Polaroid pictures, but they were not definitive proof of first degree rape of a child.

During some of the more difficult testimony of the first week, a high school class filed into the courtroom. The courts are open to the public and therefore many classes visit the court to see how the legal system functions. All the kids were about 15-17 years old, based on my best judgement. At first I thought it might be a prosecution stunt. After a few interruptions, the judge politely asked to either stop leaving the court or sit still. All of the students took that opportunity to leave the courtroom. I wish their teacher stuck their nose in the courtroom prior to them overhearing intimate details about blow jobs. It was most unfortunate.

Week two there were two full days of testimony with only one witness called by defense. After Tuesday’s testimony you could feel a strong case was being made by the prosecution. Even though, after that day I was still up in the air about things. The detectives who witnessed opened many key pieces of evidence, but didn’t show them to us until the following day.

At the end of Wednesday, my head was spinning. It was that day when we got our first glimpse into videos found by a Seattle Police computer forensics detective. He recovered files from the defendant’s computers. The defendant stashed a CPU unit in each of his two cars at the apartment. I’ve never had a more awkward 15 minutes or so of my life. Sitting in the courtroom with 13 other jurors watching the defendant in the courtroom engaged in sexually explicit conduct with children. His voice was creepy and the things he muttered in the videos haven’t escaped my head as fast as I’d like. There was no mistaking the fact that the man in the videos was definitely the man sitting on trial.

Advertisements

About lessinges

Seattle native, discovering life! I like ice cream, cold cereal, and The Amazing Race.
This entry was posted in Storytelling. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to My Private Area (pt. 2)

  1. SM says:

    Wow, Egan. Just…wow.
    I applaud you for doing this. As I said in an earlier comment – I don’t know how you could do it. But I’m glad someone did as it had to be done.

  2. jesus. i would not have been able to sit through that. the officers of the court would be busy removing his teeth from the soles of my boots after seeing one second of that

  3. egan says:

    SM – I didn't really know what it would be like to be a juror. I am relieved that a few weeks later I am easily able to distance myself from the trial and testimony in my head.

  4. egan says:

    Van – as a parent it was tough to comprehend how someone could possibly manipulate young boys that way. I gave him the benefit of doubt until the damning video evidence was viewed. There is no way you can explain your way out of video footage.

  5. churlita says:

    Why would you even go to trial if you knew they had video of you being a heinous creeper? Maybe he thought the victim would back down.

  6. egan says:

    Churlita – my guess is they hoped there would be a technicality overlooked by the police or a shorter sentence. After watching the video, it was tough to imagine how he couldn't be guilty on the other counts. The things he said to the boy will never escape my head.

  7. kelwhy says:

    as a parent – i don’t think there is anyway that i could have been a juror on that jury. I just don’t think i’m strong enough… i can’t… imagine…
    augh.
    good job.

  8. meno says:

    i guess enough people get away with this stuff that they thought they had a chance.
    i have to agree with Van though, i might have been unable to keep from physically assaulting that creep.

  9. egan says:

    Meno – it was tough to watch his smirk a few times during some of the more uncomfortable testimony. That didn't settle well with me and I was carefully observing his moves. I think the hope was something got botched as that was the defense's argument in the opening statements.

  10. egan says:

    Kelwhy – a guess I detached myself from my role as a parent as best as possible for the trial. It factored into things, but I had to be objective. Then again, I don't have older kids.

  11. I just “got out of federal jury duty” and boy am I glad.

  12. Gwen says:

    Good lord, we humans are capable of such incredible evil. Sobering.

  13. egan says:

    this new place – I guess I have zero regrets about being on this trial. I know it wouldn’t be an ideal case for most people, but it worked out alright and I’m feeling okay about things a month after its completion.
    Gwen – it’s true, we are capable of very bad things. I gave this guy the benefit of the doubt until the video was played. That was a very damning piece of evidence and explained a lot about the defendent.

  14. Dude! is there going to be a part 3?

  15. egan says:

    Snay – that’s all I have to say about this for now. I’m done with the topic since I don’t want to be thinking about what I saw in that courtroom the rest of my life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s